Article Text
PDFCommentary
Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Funding This research was supported by the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- How should we treat human–pig chimeras, non-chimeric pigs and other beings of uncertain moral status?
- The concise argument: consistency and moral uncertainty
- Implications of moral uncertainty: implausible or just unpalatable?
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Are those who subscribe to the view that early embryos are persons irrational and inconsistent? A reply to Brock
- Stem cell-derived embryo models: moral advance or moral obfuscation?
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Animus: human-embodied animals