Article info
PDFFeature article
Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
- Correspondence to Dr Julian Koplin, University of Melbourne Law School, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia; koplinj{at}unimelb.edu.au
Citation
Moral uncertainty and the farming of human-pig chimeras
Publication history
- Received October 23, 2018
- Revised March 13, 2019
- Accepted April 3, 2019
- First published June 29, 2019.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (2 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- The concise argument: consistency and moral uncertainty
- How should we treat human–pig chimeras, non-chimeric pigs and other beings of uncertain moral status?
- Implications of moral uncertainty: implausible or just unpalatable?
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson
- Price of precaution of human-pig chimeras for transplantation purposes
- Harming animals for research and for food in conditions of moral uncertainty
- Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson
- Animus: human-embodied animals