Article info
PDFThe concise argument
The concise argument: consistency and moral uncertainty
- Correspondence to Dr Kenneth Boyd; K.Boyd{at}ed.ac.uk
Citation
The concise argument: consistency and moral uncertainty
Publication history
- First published August 2, 2019.
Online issue publication
August 02, 2019
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson
- Moral uncertainty and the farming of human - pig chimeras
- How should we treat human – pig chimeras, non-chimeric pigs and other beings of uncertain moral status
- Implications of moral uncertainty: implausible or just unpalatable
- Harming animals for research and for food in conditions of moral uncertainty
- Commentary on Koplin and Wilkinson
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- A Moorean argument for the full moral status of those with profound intellectual disability
- Genetic enhancement, post-persons and moral status: a reply to Buchanan
- Is there a ‘ new ethics of abortion ’