Article info
PDFResponse
Murder, abortion, contraception, greenhouse gas emissions and the deprivation of non-discernible and non-existent people: a reply to Marquis and Christensen
- Correspondence to Prof. Hugh V McLachlan, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 0BA, UK; h.mclachlan{at}gcu.ac.uk
Citation
Murder, abortion, contraception, greenhouse gas emissions and the deprivation of non-discernible and non-existent people: a reply to Marquis and Christensen
Publication history
- Received March 20, 2019
- Accepted April 3, 2019
- First published April 24, 2019.
Online issue publication
July 01, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (24 April 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis
- Reply to Di Nucci: why the counterexamples succeed
- The “future like ours” argument and human embryonic stem cell research
- Abortion: Strong’s counterexamples fail
- Savulescu’s objections to the future of value argument
- Abortion, embryo destruction and the future of value argument
- Reply to Marquis: how things stand with the ‘future like ours’ argument
- The morality of abortion and the deprivation of futures
- Strong's objections to the future of value account