Article info
PDFExtended essay
The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Correspondence to Professor Nir Ben-Moshe, Department of Philosophy, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana IL 61801, USA; nir{at}illinois.edu
Citation
The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
Publication history
- Received December 20, 2018
- Revised April 4, 2019
- Accepted May 6, 2019
- First published June 20, 2019.
Online issue publication
October 15, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 October 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine: a reply to Clarke, Emmerich, Minerva and Saad
- Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Professional duties of conscientious objectors
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card
- Conscientious objection in medical students: a questionnaire survey