Article info
PDFOriginal research
Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to ’Abortion and Deprivation'
- Correspondence to Dr Nick Colgrove, Philosophy, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA; nick_colgrove{at}baylor.edu
Citation
Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to ’Abortion and Deprivation'
Publication history
- Received January 2, 2019
- Revised February 26, 2019
- Accepted March 7, 2019
- First published June 12, 2019.
Online issue publication
July 01, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (1 July 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Abortion and deprivation: a reply to Marquis
- Meeting the Epicurean challenge: a reply to Christensen
- Defending the two tragedies argument: a response to Simkulet
- Abortion and the Epicurean challenge
- The Two tragedies argument
- Spontaneous abortion and unexpected death: a critical discussion of Marquis on abortion
- Deprivations, futures and the wrongness of killing
- Continuing conversations about abortion and deprivation
- Infanticide and moral consistency
- Prolife hypocrisy: why inconsistency arguments do not matter