Article info
The concise argument
Clinical ethics and the duty of care
- Correspondence to Professor John McMillan, Bioethics Centre, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; john.r.mcmillan68{at}gmail.com
Citation
Clinical ethics and the duty of care
Publication history
- First published June 19, 2019.
Online issue publication
July 01, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 June 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Doctors’ willingness to give honest answers about end-of-life practices: a cross-sectional study
- Best interests and potential organ donors
- Therapeutic appropriation: a new concept in the ethics of clinical research
- Living with Crohn’s disease: an exploratory cross-sectional qualitative study into decision-making and expectations in relation to autologous haematopoietic stem cell treatment (the DECIDES study)
- Phase 1 oncology trials and informed consent
- Healthcare workers’ perceptions of the duty to work during an influenza pandemic
- The best interests of persistently vegetative patients: to die rather that to live?
- Medical futility: a conceptual model
- Refuting the net risks test: a response to Wendler and Miller’s “Assessing research risks systematically”
- Unconscious emotional reasoning and the therapeutic misconception