Article info
PDFResponse
In response to Ballantyne and Schaefer’s ‘Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research’
- Correspondence to Dr Nilay Hepgul, Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation, Florence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery & Palliative Care, King’s College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK; nilay.hepgul{at}kcl.ac.uk
Citation
In response to Ballantyne and Schaefer’s ‘Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research’
Publication history
- Received November 23, 2018
- Revised December 4, 2018
- Accepted December 12, 2018
- First published January 7, 2019.
Online issue publication
May 13, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (7 January 2019).
- Previous version (16 February 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Other content recommended for you
- Consent and the ethical duty to participate in health data research
- Holding personal information in a disease-specific register: the perspectives of people with multiple sclerosis and professionals on consent and access
- Patients’ and public views and attitudes towards the sharing of health data for research: a narrative review of the empirical evidence
- Conditionally positive: a qualitative study of public perceptions about using health data for artificial intelligence research
- Big health data: the need to earn public trust
- Developing a new model for patient recruitment in mental health services: a cohort study using Electronic Health Records
- Patients' consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data
- Assessing data protection and governance in health information systems: a novel methodology of Privacy and Ethics Impact and Performance Assessment (PEIPA)
- Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public
- Control, trust and the sharing of health information: the limits of trust