Article info
PDFExtended essay
Obesity, equity and choice
- Correspondence to Timothy M Wilkinson, Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Auckland, Auckland 92019, New Zealand; m.wilkinson{at}auckland.ac.nz
Citation
Obesity, equity and choice
Publication history
- Received March 14, 2018
- Revised August 5, 2018
- Accepted October 8, 2018
- First published October 30, 2018.
Online issue publication
June 22, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 June 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Equity and preventive regulations
- Pandemic prioritarianism
- Unequal weight: equity oriented policy responses to the global obesity epidemic
- Industry views of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: a thematic analysis of elite interviews with food and drink industry professionals, 2018–2020
- Making food-related health taxes palatable in sub-Saharan Africa: lessons from Ghana
- Prioritarian principles for digital health in low resource settings
- Support for, and perceived effectiveness of, the UK soft drinks industry levy among UK adults: cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study
- Public acceptability of the UK Soft Drinks Industry Levy: repeat cross-sectional analysis of the International Food Policy Study (2017–2019)
- Incentives, equity and the Able Chooser Problem
- Policy networks and competing interests in the development of the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverages tax