Article Text
Abstract
Over the past couple of decades, there has been an ongoing, often fierce, debate about the ethics of biobank participation. One central element of that debate has concerned the nature of informed consent, must specific reconsent be gained for each new use, or user, or is broad consent ethically adequate? Recently, Thomas Ploug and Søren Holm have developed an alternative to both specific and broad consent: what they call a meta-consent framework. On a meta-consent framework, participants can choose the type of consent framework they require, for different kinds of use, different types of user and so on. Meta-consent involves a distinctive kind of design of the consent process. Here it is argued, first, that although a meta-consent framework does not wrong participants, Ploug and Holm understate the likely costs and burdens of such a framework, so there are good practical reasons not to offer it. Second, although Ploug and Holm allude to some ethical considerations that might seem to ground an ethical argument for providing meta-consent, they do not offer any sound argument, and it does not wrong participants in any way to fail to offer them the opportunity to design their own consent process.
- research ethics
- informed consent
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors I am sole author.
Funding The author has not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Presented at Versions of this paper were presented at the Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Science, and at the Center for Ethics, University of Zurich.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research
- Turning residual human biological materials into research collections: playing with consent
- The ‘ Expiry Problem ’ of broad consent for biobank research - And why a meta consent model solves it
- The case against meta-consent: not only do Ploug and Holm not answer it, they make it even stronger
- Broadening consent — and diluting ethics
- Meta consent: a flexible and autonomous way of obtaining informed consent for secondary research
- The biobank consent debate: why ‘ meta - consent ’ is still the solution
- Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents
- Research or clinical care: what ’s the difference
- International requirements for consent in biobank research: qualitative review of research guidelines