Article info
PDFThe concise argument
The concise argument: the importance of consent and choice
- Correspondence to Professor John McMillan; john.r.mcmillan68{at}gmail.com
Citation
The concise argument: the importance of consent and choice
Publication history
- First published May 13, 2019.
Online issue publication
June 22, 2019
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Meta consent: a flexible and autonomous way of obtaining informed consent for secondary research
- Ethics of dead participants: policy recommendations for biobank research
- Broadening consent—and diluting ethics?
- The ‘Expiry Problem’ of broad consent for biobank research - And why a meta consent model solves it
- Ethical issues in computational pathology
- Obtaining informed consent for genomics research in Africa: analysis of H3Africa consent documents
- Webinar report: stakeholder perspectives on informed consent for the use of genomic data by commercial entities
- The biobank consent debate: Why ‘meta-consent’ is not the solution?
- The case against meta-consent: not only do Ploug and Holm not answer it, they make it even stronger
- Reconsenting paediatric research participants for use of identifying data