Article info
Ethics briefing
Ethics briefing
- Correspondence to Charlotte Wilson, Department of Medical Ethics, British Medical Associationm, London WC1H 9HW, UK; cwilson{at}bma.org.uk
Citation
Ethics briefing
Publication history
- First published March 22, 2019.
Online issue publication
March 22, 2019
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units
- Non-invasive prenatal testing in mitigating concerns from invasive prenatal diagnostic testing: retrospective assessment of utility in an academic healthcare system in the US
- ‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis: progress and potential
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- Women’s choices in non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy screening: results from a single centre prior to introduction in England
- Extending non-invasive prenatal testing to non-invasive prenatal diagnosis
- Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy screening
- Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis