It is never lawful or ethical to withdraw life-sustaining treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Other content recommended for you
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs  EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- Serial measurement of Wessex Head Injury Matrix in the diagnosis of patients in vegetative and minimally conscious states: a cohort analysis
- A matter of life and death
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the wrong answer is what the wrong question begets
- Back to the bedside? Making clinical decisions in patients with prolonged unconsciousness
- Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the presumption in favour of the maintenance of life is legally robust
- Deal with the real, not the notional patient, and don’t ignore important uncertainties