Article Text
Abstract
Affectively uncomfortable concern, anxiety, indecisionand disputation over ‘right’ action are among the expressions of moral tension associated with ethical dilemmas. Moral tension is generated and experienced by people. While ethical principles, rules and situations must be worked through in any dilemma, each occurs against a backdrop of people who enact them and stand much to gain or lose depending on how they are applied and resolved. This paper attempts to develop a taxonomy of moral tension based on its intrapersonal and interpersonal sources and expressions. The proposed ‘ethics of incongruity’ (EoI) outlines ways in which values, actions and needs can find themselves mismatched in morally relevant ways between patients and their clinicians, their own psychologies and their societies. Patient–clinician incongruities may manifest as discord, value misalignment and deception. Patient–patient (ie, intrapersonal) incongruities may manifest as incapacity, akrasia and self-deception. Patient–society incongruities may manifest as disenfranchisement, disaffiliation and disregard. Brief explanations of the incongruities in this scheme are provided, as are suggestions on working within them. Using concepts from moral philosophy when applicable, these suggestions may either ease direct resolution of problems arising from the incongruities, or make sense of the moral tension that arises from the human context of the ethical dilemma at hand. This presentation of content and resolution methods for the EOI is no doubt incomplete. Hopefully, refinement of this preliminary proposal will follow, particularly from clinicians, as the ones who, along with their patients, experience medical ethics in directly tension-inducing ways.
- social aspects
- clinical ethics
- autonomy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors NK is the sole author to develop the idea for this paper, perform the literature search and write the paper.
Funding The author haa not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Amoral enhancement
- The ethics of semantics in medicine
- Ethical dilemmas encountered by small animal veterinarians: characterisation, responses, consequences and beliefs regarding euthanasia
- Physicians’ personal values in determining medical decision-making capacity: a survey study
- Non-cardiac surgery in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: a single institutional experience
- Delayed febrile response with bloodstream infections in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices
- How should doctors approach patients? A Confucian reflection on personhood
- Ethics of patient activation: exploring its relation to personal responsibility, autonomy and health disparities
- Pressure and coercion in the care for the addicted: ethical perspectives
- Algorithms to guide ambulance clinicians in the management of emergencies in patients with implanted rotary left ventricular assist devices