Share
PDFOriginal research
‘Is it better not to know certain things?’: views of women who have undergone non-invasive prenatal testing on its possible future applications
Share this article
Click the icon of the social media platform on which you would like to share this article.
Email this article to a friend
Other content recommended for you
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal testing for detection of Down syndrome in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis
- Unconditional access to non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) for adult-onset conditions: a defence
- Uptake, outcomes, and costs of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing for Down’s syndrome into NHS maternity care: prospective cohort study in eight diverse maternity units
- Mainstreaming genetics into Italian prenatal care: exploring the future implementation of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the Italian National Healthcare System using stakeholder interviews
- Non-invasive prenatal testing in mitigating concerns from invasive prenatal diagnostic testing: retrospective assessment of utility in an academic healthcare system in the US
- Accuracy of non-invasive prenatal testing using cell-free DNA for detection of Down, Edwards and Patau syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Should pregnant women be charged for non-invasive prenatal screening? Implications for reproductive autonomy and equal access
- Introducing the non-invasive prenatal test for trisomy 21 in Belgium: a cost-consequences analysis
- Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of ‘routinisation’ in prenatal screening
- Preserving women’s reproductive autonomy while promoting the rights of people with disabilities?: the case of Heidi Crowter and Maire Lea-Wilson in the light of NIPT debates in England, France and Germany