Article Text

PDF
‘I just need an opiate refill to get me through the weekend’
  1. Eric Yan1,
  2. Dennis John Kuo2
  1. 1 Retired physician
  2. 2 Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dennis John Kuo, Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Diego CA 92130, USA; dekuo{at}ucsd.edu

Abstract

In this article, we discuss the ethical dimensions for the prescribing behaviours of opioids for a chronic pain patient, a scenario commonly witnessed by many physicians. The opioid epidemic in the USA and Canada is well known, existing since the late 1990s, and individuals are suffering and dying as a result of the easy availability of prescription opioids. More recently, this problem has been seen outside of North America affecting individuals at similar rates in Australia and Europe. We argue that physicians are also confronted with an ethical crisis where a capitalist-consumerist society is contributing to this opioid crisis in which societal, legal and business interests push physicians to overprescribe opioids. Individual physicians often find themselves unequipped and unsupported in attempts to curb the prescribing of opioid medications and balance competing goals of alleviating pain against the judicious use of pain medications. Physicians, individually and as a community, must reclaim the ethical mantle of our profession, through a more nuanced understanding of autonomy and beneficence. Furthermore, physicians and the medical community at large have a fiduciary duty to patients and society to play a more active role in curbing the widespread distribution of opioids in our communities.

  • pain management
  • autonomy
  • professional - professional relationship
  • applied and professional ethics
  • drugs and drug industry
View Full Text

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both listed authors contributed to the planning, conduct, writing and editing of this manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Data sharing statement No relevant data to be shared.

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.