Article Text
Abstract
Woollard and Porter argue that mothers have no moral duty to breastfeed their babies. Rather, mothers simply have moral reason(s) to breastfeed, stemming from the benefits of breast feeding for babies. According to Woollard and Porter, doing what one has moral reason to do is often supererogatory, not obligatory. I agree that mothers have no moral duty to breastfeed. However, it is misleading to suggest that mothers in general have moral reason to breastfeed and to liken not breastfeeding to not performing some supererogatory action. I will suggest mothers in general have pro tanto, but not all-things-considered, moral reason to breastfeed. Moreover, I suggest many mothers also have pro tanto moral reasons not to breastfeed. Breastfeeding is not always supererogatory; indeed, sometimes not breastfeeding is morally better. This is important because it contradicts dangerous assumptions in public discourse. One way of characterising popular consensus about breastfeeding is as Woollard and Porter do: mothers have a duty to breastfeed. But we might also characterise popular consensus differently: all moral reasons for/against breastfeeding are on the ‘pro’ breastfeeding side of the issue, whereas if there are any (good) reasons not to breastfeed these are non-moral (prudential). Woollard and Porter’s argument is important and correct in concluding that mothers have no duty to breastfeed, but it leaves this other false and dangerous idea intact and even subtly reinforces it.
- decision-making
- family
- feminism
- interests of woman/fetus/father
- philosophical ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Breastfeeding and defeasible duties to benefit
- Should we talk about the ‘benefits’ of breastfeeding? The significance of the default in representations of infant feeding
- Examining the use of ‘natural’ in breastfeeding promotion: ethical and practical concerns
- Breast feeding in infants diagnosed with phenylketonuria (PKU): a scoping review
- Is procreative beneficence obligatory?
- Approaches to supporting lactation and breastfeeding for very preterm infants in the NICU: a qualitative study in three European regions
- Breastfeeding duration and cognitive, language and motor development at 18 months of age: Rhea mother–child cohort in Crete, Greece
- Effects of in-hospital breast feeding on brain function development in preterm infants in China: study protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort study
- Breastfeeding duration and non-verbal IQ in children
- Protective effect of exclusive breastfeeding against infections during infancy: a prospective study