Article info
PDFStudent essay
Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
- Correspondence to George Gillett, Medical Sciences Division, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK; george.gillett{at}live.co.uk
Citation
Advance decisions in dementia: when the past conflicts with the present
Publication history
- Received April 26, 2018
- Revised June 12, 2018
- Accepted June 16, 2018
- First published July 9, 2018.
Online issue publication
March 18, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (22 February 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- An introduction to advance care planning in practice
- Three arguments against prescription requirements
- Formal and effective autonomy in healthcare
- Socially and temporally extended end-of-life decision-making process for dementia patients
- Which moral barriers and facilitators do physicians encounter in advance care planning conversations about the end of life of persons with dementia? A meta-review of systematic reviews and primary studies
- Practising what we preach: clinical ethicists’ professional perspectives and personal use of advance directives
- Adverse consequences of article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for persons with mental disabilities and an alternative way forward
- Is respect for autonomy defensible?
- Management of patients with an advance decision and suicidal behaviour: a systematic review