Article info
PDFExtended essay
Nudging in the clinic: the ethical implications of differences in doctors’ and patients’ point of view
- Correspondence to David Avitzour, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 9603035, Israel; davitzour{at}gmail.com
Citation
Nudging in the clinic: the ethical implications of differences in doctors’ and patients’ point of view
Publication history
- Received May 28, 2018
- Revised September 24, 2018
- Accepted October 8, 2018
- First published October 25, 2018.
Online issue publication
February 22, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 October 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Dotting the I's and crossing the T's: autonomy and/or beneficence? The ‘fetus as a patient’ in maternal–fetal surgery
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Consent for anaesthesia
- The impossibility of informed consent?
- First among equals? Adaptive preferences and the limits of autonomy in medical ethics
- What is the role of the research ethics committee? Paternalism, inducements, and harm in research ethics
- Substituted decision making and the dispositional choice account
- Is respect for autonomy defensible?
- The ethics of consent during labour and birth: episiotomies