The approach to managing the involuntary detention of people suffering from psychiatric conditions can be divided into those with clinicians at the forefront of decision-making and those who rely heavily on the judiciary. The system in England and Wales takes a clinical approach where doctors have widespread powers to detain and treat patients involuntarily. A protection in this system is the right of the individual to challenge a decision to deprive them of their liberty or treat them against their will. This protection is provided by the First-tier Tribunal; however, the number of successful appeals is low. In this paper, the system of appeal in England and Wales is outlined. This is followed by a discussion of why so few patients successfully appeal their detention with the conclusion that the current system is flawed. A number of recommendations about how the system might be reformed are offered.
- involuntary civil commitment
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Brain injury and deprivation of liberty on neurosciences wards: ‘a gilded cage is still a cage’
- Human Rights Act 1998 and mental health legislation: implications for the management of mentally ill patients
- When and how to treat patients who refuse treatment
- ‘To treat or not to treat’. Kerrie Wooltorton, lessons to learn
- Ethics briefing
- Inquests into patients who die while under a deprivation of liberty order
- Identifying and managing deprivation of liberty in adults in England and Wales
- A new mental health (and public protection) act
- Restricting freedom of people with limited awareness of maintaining their well-being: a legal quagmire
- “Personality disorder” and capacity to make treatment decisions