Article Text
Abstract
The approach to managing the involuntary detention of people suffering from psychiatric conditions can be divided into those with clinicians at the forefront of decision-making and those who rely heavily on the judiciary. The system in England and Wales takes a clinical approach where doctors have widespread powers to detain and treat patients involuntarily. A protection in this system is the right of the individual to challenge a decision to deprive them of their liberty or treat them against their will. This protection is provided by the First-tier Tribunal; however, the number of successful appeals is low. In this paper, the system of appeal in England and Wales is outlined. This is followed by a discussion of why so few patients successfully appeal their detention with the conclusion that the current system is flawed. A number of recommendations about how the system might be reformed are offered.
- involuntary civil commitment
- psychiatry
- capacity
- law
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Brain injury and deprivation of liberty on neurosciences wards: ‘a gilded cage is still a cage’
- Human Rights Act 1998 and mental health legislation: implications for the management of mentally ill patients
- When and how to treat patients who refuse treatment
- ‘To treat or not to treat’. Kerrie Wooltorton, lessons to learn
- Ethics briefing
- Inquests into patients who die while under a deprivation of liberty order
- Identifying and managing deprivation of liberty in adults in England and Wales
- A new mental health (and public protection) act
- Restricting freedom of people with limited awareness of maintaining their well-being: a legal quagmire
- “Personality disorder” and capacity to make treatment decisions