Article info
PDFResponse
Response to: ‘Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns’ by Jongsma et al
- Correspondence to Dr Scott Y H Kim, Department of Bioethics, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA; scott.kim{at}nih.gov
Citation
Response to: ‘Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns’ by Jongsma et al
Publication history
- Received July 13, 2018
- Accepted July 22, 2018
- First published August 6, 2018.
Online issue publication
January 25, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 January 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean?
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision-making in dementia
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity-enhancing care approach
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- Do guidelines on euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes reflect the law? A content analysis
- Ethics of care challenge to advance directives for dementia patients