Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
We are grateful to Jongsma et al 1 for their interest in our article analysing the case of ‘Mrs A’, a Dutch woman with Alzheimer’s disease who received euthanasia based on her advance euthanasia directive (AED).2 Their commentary criticises two elements of our analysis. First, the authors believe our reasons for doubting that Mrs A had the capacity to write and revise an AED rely on ‘partial’ empirical data and rest on normative errors. Second, they use two of our statements to suggest we must endorse some implausible claims, for example, that ‘… in all situations and for all people, current well-being should always take precedence over all other values’.
Capacity to write an AED
Jongsma et al assert: ‘Miller et al argue that people with dementia are impaired to make decisions.’ This casts our probabilistic claim about Mrs A’s capacity as an absolute claim about persons with dementia in general. It also implies we are using an outdated diagnosis-based view of capacity. The accusation then becomes explicit (italics below):
… several empirical studies have shown that patients with dementia are able to actively participate in qualitative studies and can respond to open questions in a meaningful way,[2-8] as well that they are able to complete an advance directive in the early phases of dementia.[9, 10] One can therefore not simply conclude on the basis of the diagnosis of dementia …
Footnotes
Contributors All authors meet the ICMJE 2013 criteria for authorship.
Funding Supported in part by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH Clinical Center.
Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this article are the authors’ and do not represent the views or policies of the NIH, Department of Health and Human Services, or any other part of the US Government.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision - making in dementia
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- Euthanasia in persons with advanced dementia: a dignity - enhancing care approach
- AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- Do guidelines on euthanasia and physician - assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes reflect the law? A content analysis
- Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living
- Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns