Article info
PDFResponse
Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns
- Correspondence to Dr Karin R Jongsma, Julius Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands; K.R.Jongsma{at}umcutrecht.nl
Citation
Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns
Publication history
- Received May 14, 2018
- Accepted May 31, 2018
- First published June 15, 2018.
Online issue publication
January 25, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (15 June 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2019. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- Advance euthanasia directives: a controversial case and its ethical implications
- First prosecution of a Dutch doctor since the Euthanasia Act of 2002: what does the verdict mean
- Advance euthanasia directives and the Dutch prosecution
- Response to: ‘ Dementia and advance directives: some empirical and normative concerns ’ by Jongsma et al
- ‘ Mrs A ’: a controversial or extreme case
- AEDs are problematic, but Mrs A is a misleading case
- The role of advance euthanasia directives as an aid to communication and shared decision - making in dementia
- Is this person with dementia (currently) competent to request euthanasia? A complicated and underexplored question
- Do guidelines on euthanasia and physician - assisted suicide in Dutch hospitals and nursing homes reflect the law? A content analysis
- The implausibility of response shifts in dementia patients