Article Text
Abstract
Background Medical aid in dying (MAiD) was introduced in Quebec in 2015. Quebec clinical guidelines recommend that MAiD be approached as a last resort when other care options are insufficient; however, the law sets no such requirement. To date, little is known about when and how requests for MAiD are situated in the broader context of decision-making in end-of-life care; the timing of MAiD raises potential ethical issues.
Methods A retrospective chart review of all MAiD requests between December 2015 and June 2017 at two Quebec hospitals and one long-term care centre was conducted to explore the relationship between routine end-of-life care practices and the timing of MAiD requests.
Results Of 80 patients requesting MAiD, 54% (43) received the intervention. The median number of days between the request for MAiD and the patient’s death was 6 days. The majority of palliative care consults (32%) came less than 7 days prior to the MAiD request and in another 25% of cases occurred the day of or after MAiD was requested. 35% of patients had no level of intervention form, or it was documented as 1 or 2 (prolongation of life remains a priority) at the time of the MAiD request and 19% were receiving life-prolonging interventions.
Interpretation We highlight ethical considerations relating to the timing of MAiD requests within the broader context of end-of-life care. Whether or not MAiD is conceptualised as morally distinct from other end-of-life options is likely to influence clinicians’ approach to requests for MAiD as well as the ethical importance of our findings. We suggest that in the wake of the 2015 legislation, requests for MAiD have not always appeared to come after an exploration of other options as professional practice guidelines recommend.
- euthanasia
- palliative care
- end of life care
- regulation
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors LS conceived of the project and developed the research protocol with input from VF and M-EB. LS and VF did the data collection. LS, VF and M-EB summarised the data into tables which LS used to calculate descriptive statistics. LS and VF co-wrote the manuscript. M-EB assisted with data analysis and interpretation. All authors provided critical feedback and approved the finalised draft for submission.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Ethics approval This research study was reviewed and approved by the Research Ethics Board of the McGill University Health Centre.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- End of life in haematology: quality of life predictors – retrospective cohort study
- Implementation of a palliative care consultation trigger tool for hospitalised patients with acute decompensated heart failure
- mHOMR: a feasibility study of an automated system for identifying inpatients having an elevated risk of 1-year mortality
- Acute palliative care models: scoping review
- Effects of different palliative care models on decedents with kidney failure receiving maintenance dialysis: a nationwide population-based retrospective observational study in Taiwan
- Gift of time: learning together to embed a palliative approach to care in long-term care
- mHOMR: a prospective observational study of an automated mortality prediction model to identify patients with unmet palliative needs
- Has there been any progress in improving the quality of hospitalised death? Replication of a US chart audit study
- Palliative care referral patterns and measures of aggressive care at the end of life in patients with cervical cancer
- Trends in utilisation of palliative care services in COVID-19 patients and their impact on hospital resources in the USA: insights from the national inpatient sample