Article info
Response
To die, to sleep, perchance to dream? A response to DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport
- Correspondence to Mr Joel L Gamble, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada; joel.gamble{at}mail.utoronto.ca
Citation
To die, to sleep, perchance to dream? A response to DeMichelis, Shaul and Rapoport
Publication history
- Received February 5, 2019
- Revised April 2, 2019
- Accepted May 7, 2019
- First published July 18, 2019.
Online issue publication
December 03, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 July 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Internists’ attitudes towards terminal sedation in end of life care
- Does the doctrine of double effect apply to the prescription of barbiturates? Syme vs the Medical Board of Australia
- Continuing the conversation about medical assistance in dying
- Medical Assistance in Dying at a paediatric hospital
- The provision of medical assistance in dying: protocol for a scoping review
- Terminal sedation and the “imminence condition”
- Approaches to suffering at the end of life: the use of sedation in the USA and Netherlands
- Weakening the ethical distinction between euthanasia, palliative opioid use and palliative sedation
- ‘How is it possible that at times we can be physicians and at times assistants in suicide?’ Attitudes and experiences of palliative care physicians in respect of the current legal situation of suicide assistance in Switzerland
- Palliative sedation: ethics in clinical practice guidelines – systematic review