Article Text
Response
Reply to ‘Hormone replacement therapy: informed consent without assessment?’
Abstract
In a previous article, I argued that assessment requirements for transgender hormone replacement therapy (HRT) are unethical and dehumanising. A recent response published by the Journal of Medical Ethics criticises this proposal. In this reply, I advance that their response misunderstood core parts of my argument and fails to provide independent support for assessment requirements. Though transition-related care may have similarities with cosmetic surgeries, this does not suffice to establish a need for assessments, and nor do the high rates of depression and anxiety justify assessments, especially given the protective role HRT plays towards mental well-being.
- sexuality/gender
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Responding to objections to gatekeeping for hormone replacement therapy
- Hormone replacement therapy: informed consent without assessment?
- Gatekeeping hormone replacement therapy for transgender patients is dehumanising
- Integrity and rights to gender-affirming healthcare
- What are the health outcomes of trans and gender diverse young people in Australia? Study protocol for the Trans20 longitudinal cohort study
- Cohort profile: Study of Transition, Outcomes and Gender (STRONG) to assess health status of transgender people
- Conversion therapies and access to transition-related healthcare in transgender people: a narrative systematic review
- Current management of male-to-female gender identity disorder in the UK
- Development of a computable phenotype to identify a transgender sample for health research purposes: a feasibility study in a large linked provincial healthcare administrative cohort in British Columbia, Canada
- The ethics of sexual reorientation: what should clinicians and researchers do?