Citation Tools
PDFOriginal research
Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
Download to a citation manager
Download the citation for this article by clicking on one of the following citation managers:
- Cite this article as:
- Withdrawing life-sustaining treatment: a stock-take of the legal and ethical position
Other content recommended for you
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- It is never lawful or ethical to withdraw life-sustaining treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘Why I wrote my advance decision’
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- Persistent vegetative state and minimally conscious state: ethical, legal and practical dilemmas
- Ethics briefing
- Can ‘Best Interests’ derail the trolley? Examining withdrawal of clinically assisted nutrition and hydration in patients in the permanent vegetative state
- Why the BMA guidance on CANH is dangerous
- Withdrawing treatment from patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: the wrong answer is what the wrong question begets