Article Text
Commentary
A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors This reply to critics is entirely my work.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵Here I am supporting McCullough’s position that professional ethics is constructed rather than discovered.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Why not common morality?
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- Why only common morality?
- Uncommon misconceptions and common morality
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- On Rhodes’s failure to appreciate the connections between common morality theory and professional biomedical ethics
- 30 Years Principles of biomedical ethics: introduction to a symposium on the 6th edition of Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress' seminal work
- 30 Years Principles of biomedical ethics: introduction to a symposium on the 6th edition of Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress' seminal work
- The justificatory power of moral experience
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion