Article info
Commentary
Roles, professions and ethics: a tale of doctors, patients, butchers, bakers and candlestick makers
- Correspondence to Professor Søren Holm, Centre for Social Ethics and Policy, Department of Law, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK; soren.holm{at}manchester.ac.uk
Citation
Roles, professions and ethics: a tale of doctors, patients, butchers, bakers and candlestick makers
Publication history
- Received September 25, 2019
- Accepted October 1, 2019
- First published October 19, 2019.
Online issue publication
December 03, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (19 October 2019).
- Previous version (13 November 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- On Rhodes’s failure to appreciate the connections between common morality theory and professional biomedical ethics
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- Why not common morality?
- The ethical concept of medicine as a profession discovery or invention?
- Uncommon misconceptions and common morality
- Why only common morality?
- A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality
- Medical ethics manual: does it serve its purpose?
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- Medical Humanities at the University of Wales Swansea