Article info
PDFCommentary
Uncommon misconceptions and common morality
- Correspondence to Dr Alex John London, Philosophy, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA 152133890, USA; ajlondon{at}andrew.cmu.edu
Citation
Uncommon misconceptions and common morality
Publication history
- Received September 9, 2019
- Accepted September 10, 2019
- First published September 25, 2019.
Online issue publication
December 03, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (25 September 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Why not common morality?
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- Common morality and medical ethics: not so different after all
- Why only common morality?
- A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- A waste of time: the problem of common morality in Principles of Biomedical Ethics
- The problem of ‘thick in status, thin in content’ in Beauchamp and Childress' principlism
- What principlism misses
- Determining the common morality's norms in the sixth edition of Principles of Biomedical Ethics