Article info
PDFFeature article
Why not common morality?
- Correspondence to Dr Rosamond Rhodes,Medical Education, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA; Rosamond.Rhodes{at}mssm.edu
Citation
Why not common morality?
Publication history
- Received June 18, 2019
- Revised August 8, 2019
- Accepted August 12, 2019
- First published September 11, 2019.
Online issue publication
December 06, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (6 December 2019).
- Previous version (6 December 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Defending the four principles approach as a good basis for good medical practice and therefore for good medical ethics
- Why only common morality?
- The revised International Code of Medical Ethics: an exercise in international professional ethical self-regulation
- Taking a moral holiday? Physicians’ practical identities at the margins of professional ethics
- A Defence of medical ethics as uncommon morality
- On Rhodes’s failure to appreciate the connections between common morality theory and professional biomedical ethics
- Good and not so good medical ethics
- What principlism misses
- Bioethics and multiculturalism: nuancing the discussion
- 30 Years Principles of biomedical ethics: introduction to a symposium on the 6th edition of Tom L Beauchamp and James F Childress' seminal work