Article info
PDFClinical ethics
Objectives and outcomes of clinical ethics services: a Delphi study
- Correspondence to Dr Leah McClimans, Philosophy, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA; lmm{at}sc.edu
Citation
Objectives and outcomes of clinical ethics services: a Delphi study
Publication history
- Received October 11, 2018
- Revised July 19, 2019
- Accepted August 1, 2019
- First published September 4, 2019.
Online issue publication
December 06, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (3 December 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Morisprudence: a theoretical framework for studying the relationship linking moral case deliberation, organisational learning and quality improvement
- Important outcomes of moral case deliberation: a Euro-MCD field survey of healthcare professionals’ priorities
- Ethics rounds: affecting ethics quality at all organisational levels
- Development of a core outcome set for traumatic brachial plexus injuries (COMBINE): study protocol
- Protocol for development of a core outcome set for clinical trials in melasma
- Evaluation of clinical ethics support services and its normativity
- Relevance of a normative framework for evaluating the impact of clinical ethics support services in healthcare
- Moral case deliberation
- Measuring the impact of clinical ethics support services: further points for consideration
- Protocol for the development of a core outcome set for reporting outcomes of management of velopharyngeal dysfunction