Article Text
Response
Too much medicine: not enough trust? A response
Abstract
In their paper ’Too much medicine: not enough trust?' Zoë Fritz and Richard Holton explore the connection between trust and overtreatment and overinvestigation. Whilst their paper is insightful, here I argue that much more could be made of a doctor’s (mis)trust and how this exacerbates overtreatment and overinvestigation. By taking Fritz and Holton’s view of trust as having ‘our best interests at heart’ as my starting point, I argue that doctor’s do not always trust that patients or the system has their interests at heart and so use overtreatment and overinvestigation to protect themselves. I also point to the tensions created by a lack of trust on the doctor’s part as a focal point for much needed sustained ethical analysis.
- medical error
- clinical ethics
- truth disclosure
- philosophy of medicine
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Using informed consent to save trust
- Too much medicine: not enough trust?
- Factors affecting patients’ trust and confidence in GPs: evidence from the English national GP patient survey
- Is there a moral duty for doctors to trust patients?
- Factors influencing trust in doctors: a community segmentation strategy for quality improvement in healthcare
- Patient satisfaction with hospital care and nurses in England: an observational study
- Healthcare distrust among hospitalised black patients during the COVID-19 pandemic
- What determines whether patients are willing to participate in resuscitation studies requiring exception from informed consent?
- Understanding public trust in services provided by community pharmacists relative to those provided by general practitioners: a qualitative study
- Development and validation of a socioculturally competent trust in physician scale for a developing country setting