Article info
PDFCommentary
Doing theology in medical decision-making
- Correspondence to Dr John Brewer Eberly Jr, AnMed Health Family Medicine Center, Anderson, SC 29621, USA; brewereberly{at}gmail.com
Citation
Doing theology in medical decision-making
Publication history
- Received September 3, 2019
- Accepted September 10, 2019
- First published October 14, 2019.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (14 October 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Responding to religious patients: why physicians have no business doing theology
- Whither religion in medicine?
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- The importance of prudence within inclusive bioethics
- Physicians’ duty to refrain from religious discourse: a response to critics
- Responding (appropriately) to religious patients: a response to Greenblum and Hubbard’s ‘Public Reason’ argument
- Public reason’s private roles: legitimising disengagement from religious patients and managing physician trauma
- You shall bury him: burial, suicide and the development of Catholic law and theology
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- “A kind of agonie in my thoughts”: writing puritan and non-conformist women’s pain in 17th-century England