Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors Both authors made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work; the acquisition, analysis or interpretation of data for the work; drafting the work; revising it critically for important intellectual content; the final approval of the version to be published; and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Responding to religious patients: why physicians have no business doing theology
- Whither religion in medicine?
- Public reason and the limited right to conscientious objection: a response to Magelssen
- The importance of prudence within inclusive bioethics
- Physicians’ duty to refrain from religious discourse: a response to critics
- Responding (appropriately) to religious patients: a response to Greenblum and Hubbard’s ‘Public Reason’ argument
- Public reason’s private roles: legitimising disengagement from religious patients and managing physician trauma
- You shall bury him: burial, suicide and the development of Catholic law and theology
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- “A kind of agonie in my thoughts”: writing puritan and non-conformist women’s pain in 17th-century England