Article info
PDFCurrent controversy
When does an advantage become unfair? Empirical and normative concerns in Semenya’s case
- Correspondence to Dr Silvia Camporesi, Global Health & Social Medicine, King's College London, London WC2B 4BG, UK; silvia.camporesi{at}kcl.ac.uk
Citation
When does an advantage become unfair? Empirical and normative concerns in Semenya’s case
Publication history
- Received April 20, 2019
- Revised July 26, 2019
- Accepted August 7, 2019
- First published September 16, 2019.
Online issue publication
October 25, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (16 September 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- A question of ‘fairness’: Why ethics should factor in the Court of Arbitration for Sport’s decision on the IAAF Hyperandrogenism Regulations
- Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport
- Sex, gender, and sports
- Hyperandrogenism controversy in elite women’s sport: an examination and critique of recent evidence
- What statistical data of observational performance can tell us and what they cannot: the case of Dutee Chand v. AFI & IAAF
- Determination and regulation of body composition in elite athletes
- What do we do about women athletes with testes?
- Gender identity and sport: is the playing field level?
- Serum androgen levels and their relation to performance in track and field: mass spectrometry results from 2127 observations in male and female elite athletes
- Sex segregation and sport