Article Text
Abstract
There is a fundamental tension in many sports: human sex is not binary, but there are only two categories in which people can compete: male and female. Over the past 10 years, the International Association of Athletics Federations (IAAF) regulations have been at the centre of two notable legal disputes. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) reached two contradictory rulings: in the first case (Dutee Chand vs Athletics Federation India and IAAF), the IAAF regulations for the eligibility of athletes to compete in the female category were suspended (24 July 2015) on grounds of "discrimination against the female category"; in the latter (Caster Semenya and Athletics South Africa vs IAAF), the regulations were reaffirmed (1 May 2019) on grounds that although discriminatory, they are necessary to maintain a "level playing field" and to “protect” the female category. Although Semenya’s case has paved the way for questioning existing gender norms in sport, a new stable norm has yet to emerge from her case. The pharmacological solution put forward by IAAF to the tension between fairness and inclusivity of bodies non-conforming to two sexes is not, however, the only possible solution/resolution to the case, as I aim to show in this paper. Here I present some reflections on this topic and suggest how CAS should approach the case if it hopes to resolve it.
- genetics
- genetic screening/testing
- public policy
- regulation
- sexuality/gender
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors I am sole author of this paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
Other content recommended for you
- Caster Semenya, athlete classification, and fair equality of opportunity in sport
- Sex, gender, and sports
- Serum androgen levels and their relation to performance in track and field: mass spectrometry results from 2127 observations in male and female elite athletes
- A question of ‘ fairness ’: Why ethics should factor in the Court of Arbitration for Sport ’s decision on the IAAF Hyperandrogenism Regulations
- Caster Semenya: sport, categories and the creative role of ethics
- What do we do about women athletes with testes
- Hyperandrogenism controversy in elite women ’s sport: an examination and critique of recent evidence
- Determination and regulation of body composition in elite athletes
- Gender identity and sport: is the playing field level
- Collider bias (aka sample selection bias) in observational studies: why the effects of hyperandrogenism in elite women ’s sport are likely underestimated