Article info
PDFResponse
Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Correspondence to Dr Steve Clarke, Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, Wellcome Centre for Ethics and Humanities and Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, UK; stephen.clarke{at}philosophy.ox.ac.uk
Citation
Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
Publication history
- Received August 6, 2019
- Accepted August 6, 2019
- First published August 31, 2019.
Online issue publication
October 15, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (31 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine: a reply to Clarke, Emmerich, Minerva and Saad
- Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- The need for feasible compromises on conscientious objection: response to Card
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued
- Professional duties of conscientious objectors
- In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine