Article info
Response
Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Correspondence to Toni C Saad, Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Wales, Heath Park Way, Cardiff CF14 4XW ; ToniSaad{at}doctors.org.uk
Citation
Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
Publication history
- Received July 9, 2019
- Accepted July 11, 2019
- First published August 8, 2019.
Online issue publication
October 15, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (8 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Professional duties of conscientious objectors
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine: a reply to Clarke, Emmerich, Minerva and Saad
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- In defence of medical tribunals and the reasonability standard for conscientious objection in medicine
- The Market View on conscientious objection: overvalued