Article info
Response
Professional duties of conscientious objectors
- Correspondence to Dr Francesca Minerva, Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Universiteit Gent Faculteit Letteren en Wijsbegeerte, Gent 9000, Belgium; Francesca.Minerva{at}UGent.be
Citation
Professional duties of conscientious objectors
Publication history
- Received August 5, 2019
- Accepted August 7, 2019
- First published August 31, 2019.
Online issue publication
October 15, 2019
Article Versions
- Previous version (31 August 2019).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine: a reply to Clarke, Emmerich, Minerva and Saad
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer