Article Text
PDFResponse
Professional duties of conscientious objectors
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Contributors I, FM, am the only author.
Funding This study was supported by the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Response
- Extended essay
- Response
- Response
- Response
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine: a reply to Clarke, Emmerich, Minerva and Saad
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer