Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
In his paper ‘The truth behind conscientious objection’ Nir Ben-Moshe develops a new approach aimed at justifying conscientious objection (CO) without relying on respect of moral integrity of the conscientious objector or tolerance towards her moral views.1 According to Ben-Moshe, the problem with justifications of CO based on moral integrity and tolerance is that ‘truth of conscience’s claims is irrelevant to their justification’. He argues, to the contrary, that whether the claims of the conscientious objector are true or false makes a difference in assessing whether their objection is justifiable or not. He goes on explaining that someone’s CO can be justified if it can be proved that ‘conscience can express true moral claims’.
Ben-Moshe then proceeds to explain how one can determine true moral claims. He develops an account of conscience that is modelled on that of Adam Smith. In particular, he uses the idea of the ‘impartial spectator’ to show how a true claim of conscience can emerge after careful thinking from the point of view of an impartial perspective. So, if the healthcare practitioner wants to object to a certain medical procedure after considering the issue at hand from the moral standpoint of such impartial spectator, then her claims of conscience are true (or …
Contributors I, FM, am the only author.
Funding This study was supported by the Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent for publication Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
- Extended essay
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection: unmasking the impartial spectator
- Why medical professionals have no moral claim to conscientious objection accommodation in liberal democracies
- Conscientious objection should not be equated with moral objection: a response to Ben-Moshe
- Some difficulties involved in locating the truth behind conscientious objection in medicine
- Conscientious objection and the referral requirement as morally permissible moral mistakes
- The truth behind conscientious objection in medicine: a reply to Clarke, Emmerich, Minerva and Saad
- Toward accommodating physicians’ conscientious objections: an argument for public disclosure
- Questionable benefits and unavoidable personal beliefs: defending conscientious objection for abortion
- Conscientious objection in healthcare and the duty to refer