Article info
PDFCommentary
Commentary on Charles Foster’s ‘The rebirth of medical paternalism: an NHS Trust v Y’
- Correspondence to Dr Derick T Wade, OxINMAHR, Oxford Brookes University Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford OX3 0BP, UK; derick.wade{at}ntlworld.com
Citation
Commentary on Charles Foster’s ‘The rebirth of medical paternalism: an NHS Trust v Y’
Publication history
- Received October 9, 2018
- Accepted October 10, 2018
- First published October 31, 2018.
Online issue publication
December 13, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (13 December 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Withdrawing clinically assisted nutrition and hydration (CANH) in patients with prolonged disorders of consciousness: is there still a role for the courts?
- Why I wrote my advance decision to refuse life-prolonging treatment: and why the law on sanctity of life remains problematic
- Causes and consequences of delays in treatment-withdrawal from PVS patients: a case study of Cumbria NHS Clinical Commissioning Group v Miss S and Ors [2016] EWCOP 32
- When ‘Sanctity of Life’ and ‘Self-Determination’ clash: Briggs versus Briggs [2016] EWCOP 53 – implications for policy and practice
- The rebirth of medical paternalism: An NHS Trust v Y
- A matter of life and death: controversy at the interface between clinical and legal decision-making in prolonged disorders of consciousness
- Clarifying the best interests standard: the elaborative and enumerative strategies in public policy-making
- Procedure, practice and legal requirements: a commentary on ‘Why I wrote my advance decision’
- A new kind of paternalism in surrogate decision-making? The case of Barnsley Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust v MSP
- A matter of life and death