Article info
Original research
Donor-funded research: permissible, not perfect
- Correspondence to Dr Angela Ballantyne, Department of Primary Health Care and General Practice, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand; angela.ballantyne{at}otago.ac.nz
Citation
Donor-funded research: permissible, not perfect
Publication history
- Received May 22, 2018
- Revised August 8, 2018
- Accepted August 22, 2018
- First published September 18, 2018.
Online issue publication
December 13, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (18 September 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Other content recommended for you
- Acceptability of donor funding for clinical trials in the UK: a qualitative empirical ethics study using focus groups to elicit the views of research patient public involvement group members, research ethics committee chairs and clinical researchers
- A Plutocratic Proposal: an ethical way for rich patients to pay for a place on a clinical trial
- From protection to entitlement: selecting research subjects for early phase clinical trials involving breakthrough therapies
- Fair subject selection in clinical research: formal equality of opportunity
- Beyond informed consent: the therapeutic misconception and trust
- Philanthropy on trial: can the rich rescue shelved compounds?
- Equity of resource flows for reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health: are those most in need being left behind?
- Phase I oncology trials: why the therapeutic misconception will not go away
- Fair and equitable subject selection in concurrent COVID-19 clinical trials
- Stakeholder perceptions of current practices and challenges in priority setting for non-communicable disease control in Kenya: a qualitative study