Dr Bawa-Garba, a senior paediatric trainee who had been involved in the care of a child who died shortly after admission to hospital, was convicted of gross negligence manslaughter and subsequently erased from the medical register. We argue that criminalisation of doctors in this way is fraught with ethical tensions at levels of individual blameworthiness, systemic failures, professionalism, patient safety and at the interface of the regulator and doctor. The current response to alleged manslaughter during clinical care is not fit for purpose because of its narrow focus on criminalisation and punishment of individual doctors. The justice system fails to take into account systemic issues in a sufficiently proper and informed way particularly in respect of human factors involved in decision-making. It is easier to convict individual doctors for gross negligence manslaughter than it is to effect legal accountability upon organisations. If educational reflections are used to apportion blame, then this could impact detrimentally on honesty and the duty of candour, with negative implications for patient safety. Regulatory processes should not be deployed without consideration of context. There is an urgent need for a fresh and open evaluation of professional and societal expectations from the regulator that should include positive action as well as those that are proportionately punitive. Justice and patient safety would be served better by more sophisticated contextualisation through an approach that balances accountability in healthcare with failures that can occur within complex systems, and by working to a radical shift towards a just culture.
- medical error
- professional misconduct
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Contributors Both authors have contributed equally to the initial concept, research, drafting and revision of this paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Disclaimer The opinions expressed in this paper are based on the personal views of the authors.
Competing interests AS has previously held a substantive Consultant post with University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust (for several years), and has worked for the General Medical Council (GMC), National Clinical Assessment Service (NCAS), and NHS England (NHSE). JS has no competing interest to declare.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
- Current Controversy
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Bawa-Garba ruling is not good news for doctors
- Criminalisation of unintentional error in healthcare in the UK: a perspective from New Zealand
- Drs Bramhall and Bawa-Garba and the rightful domain of the criminal law
- GMC is stripped of right to appeal against tribunal decisions
- Back to blame: the Bawa-Garba case and the patient safety agenda
- Medical manslaughter: independent review calls for root and branch reform of cases
- GMC should lose right to appeal fitness to practise decisions, says BMA
- Bawa-Garba granted Court of Appeal challenge against erasure ruling
- Hadiza Bawa-Garba wins right to practise again
- After Bawa-Garba: what the future holds for a medical profession feeling let down by its regulator