Article Text
Abstract
This paper critiques current arguments advancing the potential for transhumanism and a range of biological and pharmacological enhancements to better human flourishing. It does so from a historical perspective weighing the individualistic and competitive evolutionary theories of Darwin with the cooperative and communal theories of Prince Peter Kropotkin a generation later. In doing so it proposes the transhumanist and enhancement enthusiasts operate within a paradigm similar to Darwin’s, one that is atomist and individualistic. The critique, which considers the status of those with cognitive, sensory and physical limits, advances a vision of society as a cooperative and communal rather than individualistic and competitive. Within this framework the argument is not one of either/or but on the lexicographical superiority of the communal and social over the individualistic and competitive ethos underlying both Darwin and most contemporary transhumanist literature. This reordering of priorities, it is argued, reflects advances in contemporary biology and evolutionary thinking.
- disability
- evolution and creation
- enhancement
- ethics
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Competition, cooperation and human flourishing: commentary on Koch
- Darwin for doctors
- On the very idea of a recovery model for mental health
- The best possible child
- Can woodpeckers play rugby or Charles Darwin, where are you when we need you?
- ‘Rethinking “Disease”: a fresh diagnosis and a new philosophical treatment’
- Ethics needs principles—four can encompass the rest—and respect for autonomy should be “first among equals”
- Transhumanism, medical technology and slippery slopes
- Death, Hope and Sex
- Ecological perspectives in health research