Article Text
PDFCommentary
At odds with the truth
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Not required.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Request Permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information:
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Linked Articles
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Nudging, informed consent and bullshit
- Professional recommendations: disclosing facts and values
- Physicians ’ framing and recommendations. Are they nudging? And do they violate the requirements of informed consent
- Truthful nudging
- To lie or not to lie: resident physician attitudes about the use of deception in clinical practice
- The Cohen problem of informed consent
- Therapeutic privilege: between the ethics of lying and the practice of truth
- The duty to be Well - informed: The case of depression
- Care ethics for guiding the process of multiple sclerosis diagnosis
- Medical error in the care of the unrepresented: disclosure and apology for a vulnerable patient population