Article Text
PDFCommentary
The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
↵i Thanks to Tom Douglas for these points.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- Research ethics committees: the role of ethics in a regulatory authority
- Education of ethics committee members: experiences from Croatia
- The current state of clinical ethics and healthcare ethics committees in Belgium
- Improving the Helsinki Declaration's guidance on research in incompetent subjects
- Acceptable risks and burdens for children in research without direct benefit: a systematic analysis of the decisions made by the Dutch Central Committee
- A cross-sectional survey to investigate community understanding of medical research ethics committees
- What is the role of ethics committees after Regulation (EU) 536/2014?
- Getting the justification for research ethics review right
- ‘The ethics approval took 20 months on a trial which was meant to help terminally ill cancer patients. In the end we had to send the funding back’: a survey of views on human research ethics reviews
- Implementation of the EU clinical trial regulation transforms the ethics committee systems and endangers ethical standards