Article Text
PDF
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Moore and Donnelly argue in the paper ‘The job of “ethics committees”’ that research ethics committees should be renamed and that their job should be specified as “review of proposals for consistency with the duly established and applicable code” only.1 They raise a large number of issues, but in this comment I briefly want to suggest that two of their arguments are fundamentally flawed.
The first flawed argument is the argument related to the separation of powers. Moore and Donnelly proceed from the premise that it is pro tanto better to have an institutional arrangement that separates code-making powers and decisional powers, and then proceed to argue that this separation is not feasible for what they call ‘ethics consistency review’ because “no matter who established any prespecified review standards, the review decision maker must be empowered at review to revise those standards when this would make for an ethical improvement. This is because any understanding of ethics-consistency standards themselves and of their implications for any case is fallible and improvable in …
Footnotes
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.
Linked Articles
- Feature article
- Commentary
Read the full text or download the PDF:
Other content recommended for you
- The job of ‘ethics committees’
- Research ethics committees in Europe: implementing the directive, respecting diversity
- Is the NHS research ethics committees system to be outsourced to a low-cost offshore call centre? Reflections on human research ethics after the Warner Report
- Should research ethics committees meet in public?
- Efficiency and the proposed reforms to the NHS research ethics system
- The reform of UK research ethics committees: throwing the baby out with the bath water?
- The ESRC research ethics framework and research ethics review at UK universities: rebuilding the Tower of Babel REC by REC
- The experiences of ethics committee members: contradictions between individuals and committees
- What are local issues? The problem of the local review of research
- The structure of ethics review: expert ethics committees and the challenge of voluntary research euthanasia