Article info
PDFCharlie Gard
Paper
Charlie Gard: in defence of the law
- Correspondence to Eliana Close, Australian Centre for Health Law Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD 4000, Australia; eliana.close{at}qut.edu.au
Citation
Charlie Gard: in defence of the law
Publication history
- Received December 20, 2017
- Revised February 14, 2018
- Accepted February 19, 2018
- First published May 3, 2018.
Online issue publication
June 26, 2018
Article Versions
- Previous version (26 June 2018).
- You are viewing the most recent version of this article.
Request permissions
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
Copyright information
© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.
Other content recommended for you
- The law looks at assisted dying
- Hard lessons: learning from the Charlie Gard case
- Characteristics of deaths occurring in hospitalised children: changing trends
- The decision making process regarding the withdrawal or withholding of potential life-saving treatments in a children's hospital
- Why Charlie Gard’s parents should have been the decision-makers about their son’s best interests
- Short-term outcome of treatment limitation discussions for newborn infants, a multicentre prospective observational cohort study
- Decision making and modes of death in a tertiary neonatal unit
- Making decisions to limit treatment in life-limiting and life-threatening conditions in children: a framework for practice
- Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?
- Guest editorial: Charlie Gard’s five months in court: better dispute resolution mechanisms for medical futility disputes